Fall '04 Issue 31 What Money Doesn't Buy The Madness of George W. Bush Gimme An Oil Change YES on Measure 33: Medical Marijuana - From a Patient's Perspective Political Insanity about Physicians' Perspective Medical Cannabis Update: Big Pharma Bilks the Elderly - The Real Drug Culture Sabina and the Peaceful Nation Waiting for Me (My Being) Hubris Healing and Disability Creative Adaptation to Change Teachers Under Pressure |
Usually it goes right in the recycling. But, this letter from AARP got my attention. It announced a workshop titled, “Reduce Your Prescription Drug Costs in Three Easy Steps.” AARP reports the astonishing fact that in 2002, over 75% of Americans age 45+ take an average of four prescription drugs per day. I’m 55 and do not use any prescription drugs. Even though I’m the one in four that does not, I am also the trustee and general caretaker for my 88-year-old in-laws. They have a laundry list of medical conditions and the concomitant list of medications. My father-in-law’s monthly medication bill alone has approached $1000 at times. Since he is a retired Colonel and a stock market expert (before dementia set in), the resources are there for us. But, as I read the invite, I kept being shocked awake on an issue I hadn’t really thought of much before. What do the majority of poor elderly do, anyway? Paying for their prescriptions was a problem for 71% of people over 65, according to the AARP survey. In Oregon, the state health plan spent some $288 million on prescription drugs in the 2001-2003 biennium, compared to $189 million in 1999-2001. This was for people not covered by regular insurance. It comes out of general tax revenues. And, even if you have insurance, it means higher premiums. All this was news to me. So, I decided to go to the workshop and find out what was up. Some of it was obvious, like the fact that older people are more likely to use prescription drugs than younger people; some not as obvious, such as women are more likely to use prescription medications than men. Twenty-five per cent of folks have not filled a doctor’s prescription in the past two years due to cost. And, many have stopped taking prescriptions due to side effects or finding no measurable effect at all. Over a third of folks don’t even tell their physicians about all the medications they take; and far less than that ask for generic meds. In fact, a quarter responded that they think that generics are of poorer quality and over 40 per cent think generics are “less effective.” Yet, AARP has released a study showing that, as the baby boomers enter the age of daily users, prescription drug prices have consistently increased at a rate over three times that of inflation - from an increase of 4.1% in 2000 to one of 6.9% in 2003. Inflation actually decreased from 2.3% to 2.0% in 2003. The year 2003 also saw passage (with AARP collusion) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act. Here’s how it “works”: Then it really gets arcane. From $2250 up to $5100, the person pays it all - which means up to $3600 out-of-pocket on that $5100 total. Over $5100 is considered a “Catastrophic Benefit” and one “only” has to pay 5% out-of-pocket on top of the original $3600. Then there is something called a Medicare-approved Drug Discount Card-er, make that “cards.” Part of the 2003 legislation was that drug manufacturers could issue their own discount cards. Yet, here’s the kicker: one has to choose their card from among many BEFORE one knows just what the discount is OR just what drugs it covers. And, once the blind choice is made, there is no option for reconsideration. You can only have one Medicare-approved card at a time. You won’t even know in advance if your pharmacy even accepts the card! And, the drug companies can change what drugs are covered, and the price, on a weekly basis. Las Vegas should have it so easy. To top it off, even if one figures it out and gets properly enrolled with the right card (48% admit they cannot begin to figure it out); the discount card program ends in January 2006. Then, a new program called the Medicare Drug Benefit (Part D) kicks in, requiring another round of trying to figure out what’s going on, how to enroll, what drugs are coveredthings the many users of these drugs are limited in doing in the first place. Educating Consumers On top of this, in the same five months, Bristol-Myers Squibb shelled out $35 million to promote (er, educate) Plavix, a blood thinner. The price of Plavix rose over 7.9% during the same time period. The company also spent $7.2 million to promote Pravachol, a cholesterol-lowering drug. That one rose in price by 7%. Merck spent $24 million to advertise another cholesterol drug, Zocor, which has risen in price by 26% since 1999. It’s the same across the board: the number one med used by people over 50 is Fosamax (Merck) - up 4.9% since last year - ad budget a modest $12 million. Number two Lipitor (Pfizer) is up 4.6% on an ad budget of $67 million. Plavix (number three) is up that 7.9%. And, so on down the line. Those Three “Easy” Steps Though I got quite an education about the predatory nature of Big Pharma, in the end I did not get much help, and I’m sure from the questions asked that most of the older folks at the seminar were thoroughly confused. In the end, all AARP could offer was this (the vaunted three easy steps): A Tardy Congressional Response Ultimately, Congress will have to also institute price controls in order to take on the voracious practices of Big Pharma and do something as millions age. I await the day when legions, who came of age in the 60s, mount Capitol Hill in wheelchairs and walkers, in a giant reprise of people power. Taking on this wing of conscienceless capitalism will be perhaps the final, and most personal, life and death issue the Baby Boomers will face. Michael Donnelly lives in Salem, OR where he cares for his in-laws. His father-in-law flew 25 daytime bombing missions over Germany in W.W.II. He can be reached at pahtoo@aol.com Top | eMail Alternatives | Home Site updated Spring 2010 |